<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Facebook and Your &#8220;Privacy&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thelongview.tv/2010/06/10/facebook-and-your-privacy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thelongview.tv/2010/06/10/facebook-and-your-privacy/</link>
	<description>Tradition . . . Innovation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 16:22:37 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Lawrence Long</title>
		<link>http://thelongview.tv/2010/06/10/facebook-and-your-privacy/comment-page-1/#comment-619</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Lawrence Long</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jun 2010 00:25:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thelongview.tv/?p=211#comment-619</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Ken. As early as the 1920s, the US Supreme Court discerned a right to privacy within the constitutional concept of liberty. It has been applied more recently in key decisions regarding choices that one makes about one&#039;s own body: Griswold v Connecticut (1965), which struck down birth control restrictions; Roe v Wade (1973), which struck down abortion prohibitions; and Lawrence v Texas (2003), which struck down sodomy prohibitions (among other cases).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Ken. As early as the 1920s, the US Supreme Court discerned a right to privacy within the constitutional concept of liberty. It has been applied more recently in key decisions regarding choices that one makes about one&#8217;s own body: Griswold v Connecticut (1965), which struck down birth control restrictions; Roe v Wade (1973), which struck down abortion prohibitions; and Lawrence v Texas (2003), which struck down sodomy prohibitions (among other cases).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention The Long View » Blog Archive » Facebook and Your “Privacy” -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://thelongview.tv/2010/06/10/facebook-and-your-privacy/comment-page-1/#comment-618</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention The Long View » Blog Archive » Facebook and Your “Privacy” -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 22:25:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thelongview.tv/?p=211#comment-618</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Jim Long, Ken Camp. Ken Camp said: Facebook and Your Privacy http://shar.es/mil75 [More like Reality and Your Privacy IMHO.] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Jim Long, Ken Camp. Ken Camp said: Facebook and Your Privacy <a href="http://shar.es/mil75" rel="nofollow">http://shar.es/mil75</a> [More like Reality and Your Privacy IMHO.] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken Camp</title>
		<link>http://thelongview.tv/2010/06/10/facebook-and-your-privacy/comment-page-1/#comment-617</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken Camp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 22:21:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thelongview.tv/?p=211#comment-617</guid>
		<description>Nice post Thomas. Just thought I&#039;d add that when I was teaching security and privacy courses in the tech sector, the same holds true for the US and most other countries. The US Constitution, Bill of Rights, even the Magna Carta don&#039;t really grant a right to privacy. We&#039;ve inferred it out of our wishes for such IMHO, but it simply isn&#039;t there in my view.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice post Thomas. Just thought I&#8217;d add that when I was teaching security and privacy courses in the tech sector, the same holds true for the US and most other countries. The US Constitution, Bill of Rights, even the Magna Carta don&#8217;t really grant a right to privacy. We&#8217;ve inferred it out of our wishes for such IMHO, but it simply isn&#8217;t there in my view.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

